In the pursuit of optimizing customer journeys and increasing conversions, organizations often embrace behavioral design techniques without questioning their ethical implications. Yet, as Koen Peeters, Business and Service Designer at Proximus, cautioned during a Table 7 podcast episode in Antwerp, "There's a lot of dark patterns also out there. And there I think we need to have a clear ethical code, so we can avoid that."
This warning cuts to the heart of a growing tension in customer experience design: the fine line between helpful guidance and manipulative steering. While behavioral design can genuinely improve customer experiences by making decisions easier and more intuitive, it can also be weaponized to prioritize business profits over customer value.
Koen's perspective reflects a broader ethical awakening in the customer experience field. As organizations become more sophisticated in their ability to influence customer behavior through design choices, the responsibility to use these capabilities ethically becomes paramount. The question isn't whether we can steer customers toward specific outcomes, but whether we should—and when such steering crosses the line into manipulation.
His approach emphasizes what he calls "fair design"—using behavioral insights to genuinely serve customer needs rather than exploit psychological vulnerabilities for business gain.
Dark patterns represent the shadow side of user experience design—interface and process designs deliberately crafted to trick users into doing things they didn't intend to do. In customer experience contexts, these patterns exploit cognitive biases and psychological vulnerabilities to drive behaviors that benefit the organization at the customer's expense.
Common Dark Pattern Categories:
Bait and Switch: Customers think they're getting one thing but receive something different. This might involve advertising a basic service price but steering customers toward expensive add-ons through design manipulation.
Roach Motel: Making it easy to get into a situation but difficult to get out. Subscription services that require phone calls to cancel while allowing instant online signup exemplify this pattern.
Privacy Zuckering: Tricking users into sharing more personal information than they intended. This includes pre-checked boxes for marketing communications or confusing privacy settings.
Forced Continuity: Charging customers for services they didn't explicitly agree to continue. Free trials that automatically convert to paid subscriptions without clear notification represent this pattern.
Confirmshaming: Using guilt or shame to manipulate user choices. Decline buttons labeled "No thanks, I don't want to save money" exemplify this approach.
Misdirection: Focusing attention on one thing to distract from another. Highlighting expensive options while making cheaper alternatives difficult to find demonstrates this pattern.
The psychological mechanisms underlying dark patterns exploit well-documented cognitive biases. Loss aversion makes customers fear missing out on limited-time offers. Social proof influences decisions through fake popularity indicators. Authority bias leverages trust in expert recommendations, even when those recommendations serve business rather than customer interests.
Understanding how customers make decisions provides the foundation for both helpful guidance and manipulative steering. Cognitive science reveals that human decision-making involves two systems: fast, intuitive thinking and slow, deliberate analysis. Most customer experience interactions rely on the fast system, making customers vulnerable to design influences they may not consciously recognize.
Customers should understand how and why they're being guided toward specific choices. This includes clear pricing, honest comparisons, and explicit disclosure of business motivations. Design choices should also genuinely serve customer needs rather than just business objectives. When business and customer interests align, ethical influence becomes possible.
Customers should have sufficient information to make decisions that serve their actual needs and preferences. This requires presenting options fairly and avoiding information manipulation. Customers should also be able to easily change or undo decisions. This includes straightforward cancellation processes and clear return policies.
Design should enhance rather than undermine customer agency. This means providing genuine choice rather than creating illusions of choice that lead to predetermined outcomes.
Koen's emphasis on "fair design" reflects these principles in practice. When he mentions steering customers toward more expensive options as problematic, he's highlighting the fundamental ethical issue: using design to serve business interests at customer expense rather than finding solutions that create mutual value.
Contrary to short-term thinking that views ethical design as limiting business opportunities, research demonstrates that ethical approaches often create superior long-term business outcomes. Customers increasingly recognize and resent manipulative design, leading to decreased trust, negative word-of-mouth, and reduced lifetime value.
Organizations that consistently demonstrate respect for customer autonomy and interests build stronger emotional connections. This trust translates into increased customer lifetime value, positive referrals, and resilience during competitive challenges.
Governments worldwide are implementing regulations targeting dark patterns and manipulative design. Organizations that proactively adopt ethical approaches avoid regulatory penalties and reputational damage.
Teams working for organizations with clear ethical standards report higher job satisfaction and engagement. This leads to better customer service, increased innovation, and reduced turnover costs.
In markets where many competitors use manipulative tactics, ethical design becomes a competitive advantage. Customers gravitate toward organizations they trust to act in their interests.
The key insight from Koen's perspective is that ethical design doesn't require sacrificing business success. Instead, it demands finding creative solutions that serve both customer and business needs simultaneously. This often leads to more innovative and sustainable business models than those based on customer exploitation.
Koen Peeters' warning about dark patterns reflects a broader challenge facing customer experience professionals: how to use powerful behavioral design capabilities responsibly. His emphasis on ethical codes and fair design provides a framework for organizations seeking to influence customer behavior while maintaining integrity and respect.
The choice between dark patterns and fair design isn't just about individual tactics; it reflects fundamental organizational values about the relationship between business success and customer welfare. Organizations that choose ethical approaches often discover that serving customer interests genuinely creates more sustainable and profitable business models than those based on manipulation.
Ultimately, the question isn't whether organizations can steer customers—the tools and knowledge exist to influence behavior in sophisticated ways. The question is whether they will choose to use these capabilities to create genuine value for customers or to exploit psychological vulnerabilities for short-term gain.
By embracing fair design principles and maintaining clear ethical codes, organizations can harness the power of behavioral design to create customer experiences that truly serve human needs while building sustainable business success. In an era of increasing customer sophistication and regulatory scrutiny, this ethical approach may well become the only viable path to long-term customer experience excellence.
Ready to immerse yourself in the fascinating world of Belgian customer experience? Don't just read about it – experience the warmth, wisdom, and occasional Belgian humor for yourself. Tune in to the full episode and discover why Antwerp offers a unique lens for understanding the cultural dimensions of exceptional customer experience.
Listen Now:
Click
here to see it on Youtube
We'd love to hear your thoughts! How does culture influence customer experience in your context? Share your comments and join the conversation on social media!
